Traditional M Ā Ori s Environmental Ethic - 1473 Words

Traditional MÄ ori did have an â€Å"environmental ethic†. Traditional MÄ ori are the people who were living in New Zealand before European settlement. Aldo Leopold describes environmental ethic as â€Å"actions of self-denial in order that other species may benefit† . Traditional MÄ ori are a good example of a society who did have environmental ethic. They were conscious of sustaining the environment because of their spiritual belief that they were related to the land and equal with nature . They also believed that they were borrowing the land and they had to take care of it for future generations and this shaped the way they lived . Early MÄ ori’s environmental ethic is also shown in the ways they restricted harvests and protected the landscape. They used their language to impose restrictions and developed techniques and knowledge that informed them on the most sustainable ways to hunt and gather . However, moas did become extinct due to MÄ ori over hunting them but MÄ ori did learn from this mistake . All of this shows that traditional MÄ ori did have environmental ethic. One important aspect of MÄ ori culture that effects their environmental ethic is their spiritual relationship with the environment. MÄ ori believe that everything on earth descend from Rangi and Papa . This includes the environment. Therefore, MÄ ori believe that they are equal to nature. Nature is like their siblings and their equal . Since MÄ ori have this relationship with the environment, they have an ethic to protectShow MoreRelatedStrategic Management vs Leadership3605 Words   |  15 PagesStrategic Leadership vs. Strategic Management: Untying The Gordian Knot Robert M. Murphy, Ph.D. Professor of Management United States Army War College DISCLAIMER This views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not reflect the policy or position of the United States War College, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, the Department of State, or any agency of the U.S. government. Note from the Author This paper is a work in progress. The purpose of thisRead MoreHbr When Your Core Business Is Dying74686 Words   |  299 PagesTOP-TEAM POLITICS†¦page 90 WHEN YOUR CORE BUSINESS IS DYING†¦page 66 Y GE SE PA IN DS CK R M WA A 53 www.hbr.org April 2007 58 What Your Leader Expects of You Larry Bossidy 66 Finding Your Next Core Business Chris Zook 78 Promise-Based Management: The Essence of Execution Donald N. Sull and Charles Spinosa 90 The Leadership Team: Complementary Strengths or Conï ¬â€šicting Agendas? Stephen A. Miles and Michael D. Watkins 100 Avoiding Integrity Land Mines BenRead MoreMedicare Policy Analysis447966 Words   |  1792 Pagesspect to family coverage, coverage of the de- 9 pendents of such employee. 10 (7) AFFILIATED GROUPS.—Any employer which 11 is part of a group of employers who are treated as 12 a single employer under subsection (b), (c), (m), or 13 (o) of section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code of 14 1986 shall be treated, for purposes of this subtitle, 15 as a single employer. (8) 17 PLANS.—The 18 (as defined in section 773(a) of the Employee Re- 19